<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<records xmlns:cris="https://orex.es/ns/cris" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" generado="2026-11-12" generador="OREX CRIS" registros="3">
  <record>
    <dc:title>Chronotype, sleep quality, and functional health in active older adults: A cross-sectional study</dc:title>
    <dc:creator cris:orcid="0000-0002-7877-9515">Paula Núñez</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator cris:orcid="0009-0003-2858-7835">Irene Perez</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator cris:orcid="0000-0002-4677-7320">Carmen Perillán</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator cris:orcid="0000-0002-6330-5106">Juan Argüelles</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator cris:orcid="0000-0002-0075-8191">Elena González Díaz</dc:creator>
    <dc:subject>chronotype</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>sleep quality</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>older adults</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>active ageing</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>functional health</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>balance</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>mobility (physical function)</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>cognitive performance</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>sleep medication use</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>nocturnal light exposure</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>sex differences</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>healthy aging</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>functional independence</dc:subject>
    <dc:description>Chronotype influences sleep–wake patterns and may affect cognitive and physical functioning in older adults, yet evidence in active ageing populations remains limited. This cross-sectional study included 151 older adults (114 women, 37 men; mean age 70.6 ± 5.80, SD), enrolled in the University of Oviedo’s Programme for Senior Students. Chronotype was assessed using the Morningness–Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), sleep quality with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), cognitive performance with the Eurotest, and mobility with the Tinetti Mobility Test. Lifestyle factors, including physical activity, nocturnal light exposure, and sleep medication use, were recorded. Associations were analysed using correlation and multivariate regression models. Morning types represented 49.7% of the sample and intermediate types 43%. Higher MEQ scores were positively associated with better mobility (r = 0.20, p &lt; 0.05), and evening types showed lower balance scores than morning/intermediate types (p &lt; 0.05). Women reported poorer sleep than men (PSQI: 8.0 ± 4.01 vs. 5.7 ± 3.54; p &lt; 0.01). Sleep medication use was associated with poorer sleep quality (B = 4.42, 95% CI [3.29, 5.55], p &lt; 0.01) and lower cognitive performance (B = −0.91, 95% CI [−1.71, −0.10], p &lt; 0.05). In this active older cohort, chronotype and sleep-related behaviours were linked to functional outcomes. Morningness was associated with better balance and mobility, whereas sleep medication use and nocturnal light exposure were related to poorer sleep and cognitive performance. These findings underscore the relevance of chronobiological and lifestyle factors in supporting healthy ageing and functional independence.</dc:description>
    <dcterms:issued>2026</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
    <dcterms:type>journal-article</dcterms:type>
    <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2026.2633234</dc:identifier>
    <dcterms:isPartOf>Chronobiology International</dcterms:isPartOf>
    <dc:source>Chronobiology International</dc:source>
    <dc:identifier>urn:issn:0742-0528</dc:identifier>
    <dc:identifier>urn:issn:1525-6073</dc:identifier>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Chronobiology International, 2026, vol. 43, n. 6, p. 797-810</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:accessRights>closedAccess</dcterms:accessRights>
    <cris:quartile source="SJR" year="2025">Q2</cris:quartile>
    <cris:indexedIn>pubmed</cris:indexedIn>
    <cris:sdg number="3" provenance="automatic" source="openalex-aurora" score="0.9763" date="2026-10-13">Good health and well-being</cris:sdg>
    <dc:contributor>Instituto Universitario de Investigación Padre Ossó</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isReferencedBy>https://www.facultadpadreosso.es/investigacion/portal</dcterms:isReferencedBy>
  </record>
  <record>
    <dc:title>Translation and cross-cultural adaptation into Spanish of the Rapid Clinical Assessment of Modes</dc:title>
    <dc:creator cris:orcid="0009-0006-4700-7199">Mario Arnaiz González</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator cris:orcid="0009-0003-2858-7835">Irene Pérez-Díaz</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator cris:orcid="0000-0001-5322-580X">Estíbaliz Jiménez Arberas</dc:creator>
    <dc:subject>Spanish translation</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>cross-cultural adaptation</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>therapeutic relationship</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>use of self</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>occupational therapy</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>therapeutic communication</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>construct validity</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>inter-rater reliability</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>observer perspective</dc:subject>
    <dc:description>Introduction: The therapeutic relationship and the use of self are essential components of Occupational Therapy practice, yet few validated instruments assess these constructs across therapist, client, and observer perspectives, particularly in Spanish-speaking contexts. This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the Rapid Clinical Assessment of Modes into Spanish and to examine its preliminary psychometric properties. Method: The translation and adaptation process followed standardized guidelines, including forward–backward translation, expert panel review, and iterative revision. The Spanish Rapid Clinical Assessment of Modes was administered to 41 clients receiving occupational therapy, 6 therapists, and 7 observers. Construct validity was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis with Unweighted Least Squares estimation. Inter-version relationships were examined using Spearman correlations, Bland–Altman analyses, and Krippendorff’s alpha. Results: No missing data were observed in the Rapid Clinical Assessment of Modes item responses used for psychometric analyses. Sampling adequacy was good (KMO = 0.79–0.82; Bartlett’s test p &lt; 0.001). Parallel analysis supported a unidimensional structure for all three versions, jointly explaining 51%–61% of variance. Moderate to strong correlations were found among versions ( r = 0.48–0.65, p &lt; 0.01). Agreement between raters was substantial (Krippendorff’s α = 0.74). Conclusion: The Spanish Rapid Clinical Assessment of Modes provided preliminary evidence of structural validity, reliability, and cross-perspective consistency, suggesting its potential utility as a brief tool to assess therapeutic communication and the use of self in Occupational Therapy.</dc:description>
    <dcterms:issued>2026</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
    <dcterms:type>journal-article</dcterms:type>
    <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226261484047</dc:identifier>
    <dcterms:isPartOf>British Journal of Occupational Therapy</dcterms:isPartOf>
    <dc:source>British Journal of Occupational Therapy</dc:source>
    <dc:identifier>urn:issn:0308-0226</dc:identifier>
    <dc:identifier>urn:issn:1477-6006</dc:identifier>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2026</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:accessRights>openAccess</dcterms:accessRights>
    <dcterms:hasVersion>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/03080226261484047?download=true</dcterms:hasVersion>
    <cris:quartile source="SJR" year="2025">Q2</cris:quartile>
    <cris:sdg number="3" provenance="automatic" source="openalex-aurora" score="0.856" date="2026-10-13">Good health and well-being</cris:sdg>
    <dc:contributor>Instituto Universitario de Investigación Padre Ossó</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isReferencedBy>https://www.facultadpadreosso.es/investigacion/portal</dcterms:isReferencedBy>
  </record>
  <record>
    <dc:title>Effects of an mHealth Occupational Therapy Intervention on Functional Performance: A Pilot Study</dc:title>
    <dc:creator cris:orcid="0009-0003-2858-7835">Irene Pérez-Díaz</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator cris:orcid="0009-0006-4700-7199">Mario Arnáiz-González</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator cris:orcid="0000-0001-5322-580X">Estíbaliz Jiménez Arberas</dc:creator>
    <dc:subject>mobile health</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>occupational therapy</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>neurodevelopmental disorders</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>children</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>activities of daily living</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>telerehabilitation</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>mobile health apps</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>app usability</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>family-centered care</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>functional performance</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>PEDI-CAT</dc:subject>
    <dc:description>Neurodevelopmental disorders are one of the most prevalent conditions today, and among the limitations in activity and restrictions in the participation of children and their families, we find intervention in activities of daily living; therefore, research focused on outcome measurement is one of the most active lines, and after COVID-19, telerehabilitation has garnered special interest. BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The study objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile health (mHealth) application in improving the performance of activities of daily living in children with neurodevelopmental disorders. METHODS: The study employed a quasi-experimental design with a control group, using a fully remote mHealth-based intervention. The instruments used were a sociodemographic ad hoc, Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer, Family Outcomes Survey, Family Confidence Scale, and System Usability Scale. The final sample consisted of 13 participants. RESULTS: The mHealth intervention showed significant improvements in occupational performance in the experimental group, especially in the global score and in the Responsibility dimension of the PEDI-CAT. No relevant differences were observed in the CON-FAN and FOS scales between groups, although the latter showed improvements over time. The usability of the app was rated positively (SUS = 69.75). CONCLUSIONS: The developed application presents good usability for families of children with neurodevelopmental disorders, but to obtain better outcome measures, the intervention should combine face-to-face sessions and the use of mHealth, as well as employing the family-centered model.</dc:description>
    <dcterms:issued>2025</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
    <dcterms:type>journal-article</dcterms:type>
    <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13162015</dc:identifier>
    <dcterms:isPartOf>Healthcare</dcterms:isPartOf>
    <dc:source>Healthcare</dc:source>
    <dc:identifier>urn:issn:2227-9032</dc:identifier>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Healthcare, 2025, vol. 13, n. 16, p. 2015</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:accessRights>openAccess</dcterms:accessRights>
    <dcterms:license>cc-by</dcterms:license>
    <dcterms:hasVersion>https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/13/16/2015/pdf?version=1755259629</dcterms:hasVersion>
    <cris:quartile source="SJR" year="2025">Q1</cris:quartile>
    <cris:indexedIn>pubmed</cris:indexedIn>
    <cris:sdg number="3" provenance="automatic" source="openalex-aurora" score="1" date="2026-10-13">Good health and well-being</cris:sdg>
    <dc:contributor>Instituto Universitario de Investigación Padre Ossó</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isReferencedBy>https://www.facultadpadreosso.es/investigacion/portal</dcterms:isReferencedBy>
  </record>
</records>
